Services

Full Growth System Creative Strategy Creative Development Paid Media Management How It Works Results About Talk to Us

the grid

Every ad makes one argument to one kind of buyer. Most accounts only make a few.

The Funnel Messaging Matrix is a grid of messaging jobs. The rows are what a customer already knows; the columns are how the ad persuades. Every brief BrightCircle writes is one cell: a specific customer, a specific argument. Map an account onto the grid and you can see which arguments the budget keeps repeating and which customers have never heard a case at all.

Fifteen jobs. Most accounts do four of them.

Row = what they know
Col = the job

PEProblem EducationThe tension is doing the persuading.
PCProduct CaseThe product itself is doing the persuading.
BSBrand StoryBrand meaning is doing the persuading.
PRProofValidation is doing the persuading.
OFOfferThe deal is doing the persuading.
Row 1Cold"Assume nothing."They don't know the category is any good, and they don't know you. Earn relevance from zero.
1–PE

Name the pain cold. Dramatize the frustration a first-timer feels before they've heard of you.

1–PC

Introduce the product as the fix. Lead with the single most craveable feature or benefit, assuming no prior context.

1–BS

The first handshake. The one piece of your origin or mission that makes a total stranger care who you are.

1–PR

First-timer validation. A reaction, demo, or bit of buzz that proves to someone who has never heard of you that the product is real.

1–OF

Low-risk entry deal. The offer that makes a first try feel safe: starter size, first-order discount, free shipping.

Row 2Comparing"They know the category, not you."They're already weighing options. Win the comparison against what they use now.
2–PE

The alternative is the problem. Show what is wrong with what they reach for now, to someone already shopping the category.

2–PC

Win the head-to-head. The specific features where you clearly beat the alternative they are weighing.

2–BS

Not like the others. The part of your story that separates you from the tired, mass-market default.

2–PR

Side-by-side proof. Validation against what they usually buy: the taste test or comparison that tips the decision.

2–OF

Smarter-value deal. The offer that makes you the better-value pick versus the alternative.

Row 3Familiar"Assume they know you."They're already in your world. Deepen the relationship or reactivate a past buyer.
3–PE

Re-raise a problem for insiders. A reason to come back: running low, rationing a favorite.

Often a gap
3–PC

News for people who know you. "It's back," a new variant, leaning on products they already recognize.

3–BS

Deepen the world. Culture, lore, community, or behind-the-scenes for people already in your orbit.

3–PR

Proof aimed at fans. Validation that trades on familiarity: returning creators, fan reactions, "you asked, they answered."

3–OF

Reactivation deal. Restock, drop, loyalty, or fan-favorite return that pulls past buyers back.

Scroll the grid sideways to see every column →

Problem Education Product Case Brand Story Proof Offer

Scroll the grid sideways to see every column →

One grid per customer segment. Every brief points at a single cell, so the account can answer one argument at a time.

A new format is not a new argument.

Changing the template, the hook, or the edit can leave the same argument pointed at the same person. A format test and a message test look alike on a report, so budget piles onto one argument while the rest of a segment’s questions go unanswered.

The grid works one level down, on the belief each ad asks someone to accept.

Each column is a different way to persuade.

In a Problem Education cell, the tension does the persuading: the ad names a problem the buyer has felt and never named, before any product case can land. In a Product Case cell, the product itself does the persuading.

A buyer who has never heard of the category and a buyer comparing three brands in an open tab need different jobs done, and the rows keep those buyers separate so one ad stops trying to serve both.

The crowded cells are where the budget already sits.

Lay the live account over the grid and the pattern shows up fast. Spend, conversion volume, and acquisition efficiency concentrate in a few cells, usually the ones that built the account. Around them sit empty cells, arguments no one has made to customers no one has addressed, and the empty ones are usually where the next customer is.

The team ranks the next hypotheses by two measures, the customer evidence and the account economics, so the next test goes to the cell with the strongest case.

The grid keeps a brief honest about its job.

Each brief states the segment, what that customer already knows, and the one persuasive job of the ad. The creative gets judged on whether it did that job.

Results feed back into the grid: a cell that converts earns more depth and budget, and a cell that fails closes with a real answer. Over a quarter the grid becomes a record of what the market proved, argument by argument.

The matrix shows which arguments a group has already heard and which cells stand open, and TAM Stacking uses that to rank which customer group joins the account next. When a cell becomes a brief, it gets written against the Brand Canon, so a new argument still sounds like the brand making it.

Talk through the growth constraint.

Tell us where growth has slowed, what the current team owns, and what you have tried. We will identify the strongest starting point.

Talk to Us →